Sherlock Holmes for Dummies
Holmes developed various methods to help solve problems in the society. For example, Holmes developed various methods to solve criminal cases. The main method used to solve criminal cases was deductive reasoning. Holmes argues that when one eliminates the impossible what remains is the truth. This is evidenced in his comments. Holmes practical principles are of the kind if p then q. In this case represents evidence observed and q represents the content of the evidence (Crowder &Doyle, 2009).
Holmes deductive method has been applied in various books. For example, it has been applied in “the adventures of the Musgrave ritual”. The adventure of the Musgrave ritual is a story written by Arthur Conan Doyle. The story features Sherlock Holmes. Watson remembers the events that resulted from his visit in the university. Musgrave visits Holmes after Rachel Howells and Richard Burton. The two disappeared after Musgrave refused Burton from reading the Musgrave ritual.
Holmes applies the deductive method to resolve the cases. Holmes looks at the cases one, but not three cases. Holmes considers the riddle of ritual as a useless and meaningless tradition to Musgrave and other people in the society. On the other hand, Holmes sees the riddle important to Burton. Though the riddle was useless to other members in the society, it was important to Burton as it was aimed at discovering something important. Rachel did not help Bruton lift the slab and this led to the death of Bruton. After Burtons death, Holmes uses the concept of deduction to discover the truth. Holmes examines the bags that were gotten from the mere and discovered metals parts. That is gold and some gems. The narrator thought that the gold was King Charles I gold crown that was being kept for his successor. The ritual acted as a guide to determine the important symbols. This is evidenced by Reginald comments. Reginald argued that Sir Ralph Musgrave was a king.
Apart from discovering a king, Holmes discovered other things after examining the cases. For example, Holmes discovered that the king had died before educating his son about the importance of the ritual. Hence, this made the ritual an old fashioned custom for than 20 decades. In the adventures of Musgrave, Holmes eliminated the impossible and remained with the truth (Crowder &Doyle, 2009).
Further, Holmes uses his deduction method to resolve Sir Eustace Bracken stall case in ‘the Abbey Grange’. Sir Eustace was killed by thieves in his house. Inspector Stanley Hopkins argues that Sir Eustace was killed by Randal gang. Holmes examined various things in the crime scene to determine the cause of the death. For example, he evaluated the knots in the bell rope and the frayed end. After examining the knots he realizes that the bell rope was pulled and the bell was supposed to ring in the kitchen. After realizing that, Holmes asked the wife, maid and other people in the house why they did not hear the bell ring, but they claimed that they could not hear it as it was far. In addition, Homes realized that the thieves did not take a lot of goods.
Apart from investigating the knots, he examined the bottles of win and glasses and notes that the cork had been removed using a multiplex knife instead of corkscrew. After analyzing the evidence and its content, Holmes concluded that the Randall gang was well described in the papers and the person who described them used the descriptions. He also noted that it was odd that the thieves hit the wife to stop her from screaming. In addition, Homes argues that it was weird that the three decided to kill the husband as they could have overpowered him. The evidence in the crime scene proved that only two people killed the husband, but not three as the glasses were two and the criminals poured dregs in the third glass. Hence, he concluded that the wife and the maid were lying (Crowder &Doyle, 2009).
Also, Holmes used the deductive method to investigate a case in the Man with Twisted Lip. Holmes analyzes the death of St Clair and he concluded that St Clair was murdered by Hugh Boone. Later, his wife discovered some of her husband clothes and a wooden bricks from the den. He also discovered his husband coat with money in Thames house below their house. After Holmes revealed his evidence, beggar Hugh was arrested by the police and imprisoned. However, Holmes changed his mind after Clair’s wife received a latter from her husband. Holmes decided to use a sponge to wash the face of Hugh and later it is revealed that the beggar was not Hugh, but St Clair. This solved the case and Holmes noted that there was no crime committed (Crowder &Doyle, 2009).
The method is also used to determine who kidnapped a pupil in the priority school. In the story, Homes decided to go back to Mckleton with Huxtable. Holmes asked the boss several questions to determine if his wife kidnapped the boy. The boss was not aware that his wife is part of the kidnapping. After investigating the kidnapping Holmes concluded that the kidnappers used the nearby road to escape. This is evidenced by the police report. The police discovered the boys cap on some gypsy’s possession. Also, Holmes discovered that the Heidegger was responsible for the disappearance of the boy. This is because Holmes discovered his dead body and bicycle tracks (Crowder &Doyle, 2009).
Apart from using deductive method in the adventures of Musgrave, and other stories, Holmes used his weapon and martial art methods in ‘the empty house’. The ‘empty house is one of the Sherlock’s stories’. The story was developed after the supposed death of Holmes at the Reich Bach falls. The story involves several murders. For example, the Murder of Ronald Adair. Holmes is given different types of weapons. For example, Holmes argues that people use weapons to carry out crime. In this case, Holmes and Watson carry pistol with them. Watson argues that the pistol is used in seven different incidences. Another weapon is the cane. Holmes carries a cane and uses it twice as a weapon (Crowder &Doyle, 2009).
The book ‘the empty house’ revolves around the death of Adair. Adair was found dead in his house after being shot on the head. Watson found it hard to establish how the murders managed to get into the house as it was very difficulty to get into the house. In addition, Watson did not get any evidence that someone used the window to get into the house and also leave the house. Also, Watson was disappointed that the killer did not take the money on the table Watson visited the crime scene in park lane to gather more evidence about the crime. Later Watson discovered that Holmes is not dead. Holmes has used the disguising method to show the truth.
Holmes used disguise to gather evidence in many stories. Holmes pretended to be sick and wounded in many stories so as to give an effect to his cases or implicate people involved in the cases. Holmes faked his death in the empty house so as to give an effect in his case. Though most people like Watson believed that Holmes was dead, they later realized that Holmes was not dead. This is because he appeared later and proved that he was not dead, but fought hard to survive. He also tried to hide from the Moriarty’s gang so as to prevent them from killing him. Holmes tricked Watson into believing that he was dead by making the scene fool him (Crowder &Doyle, 2009).
Further, Watson used his disguise technique to determine who killed Adair. After returning home, Holmes and Watson went out to resolve some crimes and stop crimes. Watson was not aware of Holmes intention and they ended to Baker Street where they went to a dark empty house opposite Holmes house. After arriving at the house homer and Watson sat for two hours watching the house, but nothing happened, after some time, the house silhouette moved. Later a man sneaked into the dark house where Holmes and Watson were hiding and tried to shot them, but Homes prevented them. Moran and his friend were arrested by the police and later Holmes learned that Moran killed Adair .This is because he did not want to expose him. Hence, his disguise method helps him solve the case (Crowder &Doyle, 2009).
Reference
Crowder,D.A.,&Doyle,S.(2009).Sherlock Holmes for Dummies. For Dummies
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
