Moral Impact of Restructuring a Company’s Rules
Restructuring the company’s rules has no impact on the moral behavior of employees and management as behavior is rarely shaped by rules and regulations. Research has shown that personality and traits are highly effective in determining the behavior of individuals regardless of the set rules as at some point when the rules do not apply they will find ways of reverting back to their normal behaviors (Newton, 2004).
The other reason as to why reconstruction has minimal impact on morals is the nature of business ethics that are employed by business manager to carry out successful transactions. Although shareholders will be elated to learn that their company is doing fine in terms of productivity, the failure of the firm is equally important as it will generate more challenging opportunities for diversifying strategies which will uplift the business. However, management has been known to conceal such information from stakeholders which is unethical but healthy for normal running of the business (Newton, 2004).
In as much as society regards transparency as a determinant of successful business management, this has been deluded by enacting rules which portray employees as not part of management hence they are not included in critical processes of the firm. When such scenarios arise, out of guilt, employees may engage in a series of demeaning episodes that are coupled with ingenuity. This is an unethical line of business as divisions are bound to arise, as well as, lack of trust and the moral value of the restructuring are not attained (Newton, 2004).
Therefore, it would be difficult to carry out restructuring in the name of changing the moral code of conduct among employees and management.
Reference
Newton, L. (2004) taking sides: clashing views on controversial issues in business ethics and society. Dewey.
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
