Civil War And Its Effects
The topic if the south could have won independence during the civil war and its effects has become a hot topic (Davis, 1996). People have different ideas about the south wining its independence during the civil war. Many people think that the south would have been a better country to stay it won its independence during the civil war. This is because the independence could have improved governance in the country, security and economic status. Other people think that the south would not have been a better country to live if the south won the independence during the civil War (Davis, 1996). Most people support the idea that if the south had won its independence during the civil war, it would have been a more beter country to stay.Most people think that had the south won its independence during the civil war it would have been a better place to live. The war between two States would oppress one states and another win. The country would have been more developed had the south won independence before the civil war. The developers of the country had good visions than curent leaders that would have made the country more comfortable to live (Golson, 2007). The visions could have helped reconstruct the country, and improve living standards in the country.
For example, the founders had no visions of creating big governments that interfere with citizens’ rights. In addition, making laws could be better than today if the south won its independence during the civil war. Laws could be made at all levels. That is the state level and local level. This could have eliminated governments that are weak and cause more harm to the citizens than benefits. Most governments do not benefit the citizens as they have enacted laws that oppress the citizens. Moreover, the governments infringe citizens rights listed in the constitution (Formby, 2008). Several issues in the country could have been eliminated if the south won independence during the civil war. First, the independence could have eliminated personal income tax. The income tax is not authorized in the constitutional, and it has adverse effects to low- income earners in the country. Many people in authority today misuses money contributed by citizens. The money could be used well to improve various sectors in the country like education and health care (Formby, 2008). Most of the sectors in the country are not managed well due to the high rate of corruption in the country. The management of the various sectors could be done at the local level, but not state level.
This could prevent misuse of money and power.Secondly, the independence could have encouraged centralized government. Centralized government could have benefited the citizens more than the current government (Formby, 2008). Another advantage of the south wining the independence is the end of slavery (Formby, 2008). The independence could have made it for people in the south to maintain slaves. People in the south could consider paying workers in the industry and charging them housing fee and food, but not retain them like slaves. Thus, the independence could have helped end slavery in the country. Others have different opinion about slavery. They argue that slavery could have ended even after the civil war. They see the independence in the south useless. Slavery could have ended as people could replace slaves with machines. Also, slavery could have ended because slaves were freed as the south fought for independence during the civil war. Other countries like the north could have followed the same principle.
They could have freed slaves from the country and imported technology to manage plantation. Thus, the independence could have ended slavery in the world (Cozzens, 2004).Also, the independence could have helped increase the population in the country. This is because the south could be a better place to stay. The population in the country could have grown much. This could have made the south a popular country in the current society. The form of governance in the south could be better than in the north. This is because the south encourages state rights, and federal government. The federal government in the south would help the improve living standards in the South by enhancing the form governance in the country (Cozzens, 2004). Apart from increasing population, the independence could have helped improve security by preventing crimes in the country (Cozzens, 2004). Other people think that the south could not have benefited from the independence. They argue that the south could not have lasted long as an independent nation.
This is because the country depends much on slavery and agriculture (Cozzens, 2004). The independence could end slavery in the country, and this could affect agriculture in the country. Many people in the country use slaves to manage plantations. The independence could lead to decline in agricultural productivity in the country. Many people could buy machines and other technological equipment to manage plantations. This could increase the production cost and other coats like maintenance. At the end, agricultural production in the country could collapse. Many people argue that, at the end, the country could become a communist because it could not have powers to remain independent. Also, the country could not have enough powers to fight the US (Castel, 1996).The south failing to win the civil war has an advantage as it could have prevented the country from getting into World War I and World War II. This is because the United States could not use force to bring the country back. Hence, the failure to win the civil war could have saved the country a lot of destruction.
The World War I and World War II caused deaths and destruction of property in the country. The failure could save the country from getting into various types of war like the American, Spanish war (Castel, 1996).Most historians argue that if the south had won the civil war it could have created peace in the country. If the country had gained independence, it could have formed a perfect constitution government. The government could help eliminate war activities in the country and build the country into a perfect nation. But, the south did not manage to achieve the advantage. Most countries could have learned how to help each other in times of war instead of causing more conflicts from the south (Castel, 1996).Other historians think that even if the south won the independence, they could have still been involved in World War II and World War II (Castel, 1996). So they see no difference between wining the civil war, and not wining the civil war. They argue that the south having a successful economic status depend on the effect the north has on the south.
If people in the north continue holding the south, then it would not become successful. Thus, the country being engaged in World War one and World War two has no effects on south having good economy (Castel, 1996).In conclusion, the debate about the south wining the independence during the civil war and its effects has become common. Most people think that the south wining the civil war has effects on the country and its citizens (Castel, 1996). They argue that the independence could have made the south a better country to stay. Other people think that the south wining the civil war has adverse effects to the country and citizens than benefits. If the south won the civil war, it would have helped end slavery and improve governance in the country. Also, it could have helped improve security in the country and economic status of the country. Other people argue that if the south won the independence, it would have created more conflicts than if it did. The country could have been involved in World War I and World War II. It could not have helped the country have better economic status (Castel, 1996).
Reference
Castel, A.E. (1996).Winning and losing in the Civil War: essays and stories. Univ of South Carolina Press
Cozzens, P. (2004).Battles and leaders of the Civil War. University of Illinois Press
Davis, W.C.(1996).The battlefields of the Civil War: the bloody conflict of North against South told through the stories of its battles, illustrated with collections of some of the rarest Civil War historical artifacts. University of Oklahoma Press
Formby, J. (2008).The American Civil War, a Concise History of Its Causes, Progress, and Results. READ BOOKS
Golson, J.G. (2007).A house divided during the Civil War era. ABC-CLIO
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
