Emergent Leadership Approach
Emergent Leadership Approach
Question #1 Discuss the changing approach to leadership popularity as a feature of ‘group–emergent’ leadership, what defines the situations in responding to leadership and what yields a ‘handsome pay off’
The convention controversy and concern about leaders and leadership stretch deep in to the history of social philosophy. During this ancient approach, leadership held an imminent position of defining the empirical work that disclosed the qualities of the leader. Recent studies have seen the leader displaced from the former center-stage position, where us not long time ago it got typical to engage in a quest for expanded traits of leadership. In the past, the responsibility of the leaders went beyond just getting appointed since it required diligent traits form aspiring leaders. Furthermore, there was a distinction and recognition between the appointed leader s and those who emerged through the willing response of followers. Leadership popularity as a feature of group emergent leadership got enhanced through the burgeoning interests in informal groups with self-creating status and hierarchies.
During the ancient era, popularity as a feature of group-emergent leadership got provided disproportionate significance. Additionally much of the past social metric work equated choice as a leader, and several acknowledged and substantial studies provided credence to the presumed equivalence. The situation gets defined by the traits and popularity that engages leader’s participation in enveloping leadership qualifications. Having popularity and traits that define the leadership, the next step becomes yielding a well pay off. This result from leadership that gets specified is suiting various kinds of the situation, facing distinctive challenges, and emerging strong in a leading position. Furthermore, regarding the followers as a crucial factor in any leadership event and fro arguing the study direct at the follower will eventually yield a handsome pay off.
#2 Explain what two things are important to an individual’s attainment of leadership. Conversely, what can cause a leader to lose influence and be replaced by one of the ‘followers?’
The cumulative findings suggest that two things in particular get to be significant in an individual attainment of leadership. First and foremost, that he must be seen as competent in the group’s central task. By being competent, the leader should be able to display leadership qualities such as confidence, understanding, and accountability in all that he does. The second importance in individual attainment of leadership gets perceived as the member of the group what Brown (1936) has called “membership character.” Any group member gets bound by certain expectancies whether roles or norms which prevail at a given time. To directly put to test this could seriously likely limit his upward mobility, unless an individual got extremely competent and, what gets significant, broadly viewed as such. In case the group losses confidence in the competence of the leader, the leader might lose influence and be replaced by one of the followers who qualify in competence and membership character. In addition, since the group gets bound by certain expectances such as norms and roles bleaching them would imply that the leader losses his leadership position. The leader’s termination gets enforced using the terms and conditions placed in the group, which must be followed strictly. His replacement gets effected by electing another individual as a leader of the group. Additionally, adherence to the prevailing expectances of the group is essential for the group member’s acceptance.
#3 Explain the source of organizational power, how it is shared, and what overall impact it has on decision making?
First let’s begin by understanding what organizational power is. In trying to find out what organizational power gets to be (Pfeffer and Slancik) argued that although many organizational informants will be willing define organizational power, it is unlikely they would be unable to disclose that information. Surprisingly, most people do not require explicit definitions to comprehend what power is. Powers means the aptitude to get things done the way one wants them to be done. For example, Mrs. Dotfire sends her son to the shopping center to by some greens, and the boy performs that activity. This implies that Mrs. Dotfire has power over her son, in the same way a boss sends his messenger to post mail power gets utilized to get work done. Organizational power starts from the strategic –contingencies theory of power, which gets determined by the appealing picture pointed by it. Furthermore, the strategic plans laid down by organizations helps in sourcing dominance.
Organizational powers get created by the leadership, which stipulates the system adjacent to the requirements of the entire corporation. The organizational power gets shared according to the levels of duties the members get positioned. In other words, organizational power gets shared by placing people in working positions since no one person can control the whole organization single handedly. In addition, power sharing involves organizational development or participatory democracy. This means that sharing of power in an institution checks to balance the desired activities of the organization. The overall impact of power sharing gets to influence decision making in the entire organization. Power sharing creates a system used for decision making which gets implemented, from the top leadership to the least leadership. For instance, in an organization the chair person or the chief executive officer (CEO) has the most power which gets shared by the general manager, Human resource manager, and unit supervisors as the least powers. This group of leadership positions works in a systematic way from the senior most people to the junior worker. Therefore, power sharing influences decision making depending on the levels of leadership.
#4 Describe briefly the major ‘bases of social power’. Identify, which ones are the strongest and briefly explain why they are.
The key bases of power get determined by some 2 social concepts questions that influence social power. This bases include; what determines the behavior of the agent who experts power? And what determines the reaction of the recipient of this behavior? On a different start, the key bases of power get to be the relationship between O and P. The P powerbases are stronger than the O because P has the power to force O to submission. P has the power to mediate on O in case of severe punishment.
# 5 Discuss legitimate power with regard to its bases, range and its intersection with influence?
Legitimate power gets probably to be the most complex of those treated here, enveloping the idea from the structural sociologist. Legitimate power influences social psychologist in their activities and supports. Conceptually one may think of legitimacy as a valence in a religion which gets induced by some internalized value or norm. This value has the same conceptual property power, namely an ability to persuade force fields.
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
