Increased American Troops In Iraqi
The escalation/surge of American troops in Iraqi
Though the term escalation has found new meaning and popularity in the United States as a defining term to the increased number of troops in Iraqi, the same scenario term was being used during the Vietnam War to describe similar situations. Escalation refers to long term military presence with no hope of withdrawing. The term has been contrasted with surge which refers to a brief but powerful presence of the military whose intensity is greater than in the escalation. Due to the time span within which the surge or escalation is likely to take place, Iraqi has found comfort in the surge which appears to be less harmful due to its reduced time span and the aggressiveness is also reduced. However, the real scenario is that of the American troops being posted in huge numbers in what is referred to as the newest escalation of America in Iraqi. This newest development has resulted into a series of benefits as well as excessive compromise which is inclined towards Iraqi (Cooper, 2009).
Framing of the Iraqi war
The use of the word surge in the Iraqi war was used by the then United States president George W. Bush to alter the general perception of the people on the intensity of the war on Iraqi. Therefore, the Iraqi was made to believe that it would be a short episode of less intense war while in mind of the military it was another escalation. Consequently, the word surge was used to eliminate any past notions of surges and escalation after the Vietnam War that was still fresh on people’s minds (Cooper, 2009).The word choice in describing the scenario is thus justified as most people ended up buying the story portrayed by the president and most believed in the thought of having a short-term troop occupation. Surge as the new way forward was used to reduce any usage of escalation which brought about poor results in the Vietnamese war (Engelhardt, 2007).
Visual imagery was also employed candidly in the situation as the architects of the war gave the public a chance to compare and contrast short-term to long-term military occupation. Such a tradition is bound to have certain cons like benefiting the military and the United States as it will be able to carry its war-like activities as planned. However, Iraqi will have to contend with having the American troops for longer hence more Iraqis are bound to loose their lives (Cooper, 2009).Comparing the two websites, the one thing which is clear is that a surge is not eminent but the two sides are on for long-term war otherwise called escalation. However, one group that has the pros lacks a clear mission for the surge/escalation hence it may go on beyond the imagination of either party. A pattern that is common in both websites is that the public is aware of the stereotypes being created by the terms hence the altering of perception has been eroded from the public (Engelhardt, 2007).
Presentation of self
From past rituals and wars which the United States has engaged in, it is hard not to pick out the real intentions of the war. That is the war will not end any time soon such that by using various words to refer to the increased number of troops in Iraqi soil, the American military is sending signals of not ending the war any time soon. In the microinteractionist tradition there is no ideal society where plans are executed as planned. This is depicted by the tradition arming the public with values such as that there are no short-term wars. Similarly, by communicating the span of the war the American military sets the platform by identifying it as the pioneer of the war hence as a way of retreating from society the president makes the announcement as a ritual before sending more troops to Iraqi.
The presentation of self through pros calls for each individual having their own perception of society and real things such that in as much as the American troops in Iraqi is seen as a short-term presence, the reality of the issue is that according to the Iraqi, the ideal or short-term is quite different. This is in line with the aspect of microinteractionist theory where the perception of timing and the real universe are uniquely built by an individual (Engelhardt, 2007).The language used in the two websites also provides a different perspective through which both parties are able to demonstrate their knowledge of the two terms. Consequently, stereotypes are easily convinced by the notion that there is an ideal time orientation in all societies, without paying much thought to the rituals that are carried out in presentation of self (Randall, 1994).
Form of Disruption, Repair and Response in social discourse
Social discourse in this microinteractionist tradition is the fact that response has been made after the scenario was established. When the American troops started moving into Iraqi again, the American government was swift to respond to the new events as a way of restoring peace in the war torn country. This was timely as the normal society in Iraqi had been disrupted again with the surge of troops hence appropriate response had to be given as a way of responding to the issue. Consequently, the ritual depicted prior involvement in other wars and as the image of the United States military was badly damaged during the Vietnam War, this image had to be repaired to win over the public’s trust (Randall, 1994).Response in the form of reframing the previous terminology although the intentions are the same in both cases was thus applied by the American government to repair the already tainted war history (Randall, 1994).Repair and response often take place after the normal routine has been disrupted. Society has been made to realize that for any response to be made there must have been acceptance of a situation going wrong or else the plans failed to succeed hence plan B had to be adopted with newer strategies.
Analysis reflection on social discourse
In conclusion in the political arena, the microinteractionist theory applies collectively in attempting to alter the already known to a more convincing scenario. Therefore, the stereotypes which are created by society have to be modified by use of proper presentation of self to mark the occurrence of disruption. This will be vital in determining the possible responses that a will be incorporated to repair the disrupted idea or notion.
References
Cooper, H. (2009), putting stamp on Afghan war, Obama will send 17000 troops. The New York Times February 17, 2009. Retrieved on November 22, 2010 from: www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/washington/18web-troops.html
Engelhardt, T. (2007), Tomgram: all time highs in Iraqi. retrieved on November 22, 2010 from: www.tomdispatch.com/post/174828/all_time_highs_in_iraq –
Randall, C. (1994), four sociological traditions. OxfordUniversity Press
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
