Logical Chain: Evidence

The research has shown that individuals who have received weak support evidence on a proposition are less positive on the result than individuals who have receive no evidence at all. The effect on weak evidence shows that this evidence could be used by people to communicate between the political and marketing discourse. A good proof has mainly to do with trustworthiness of truths and theories that may help to explain the facts. In science facts are recognized and known as truth and people who use evidence many of them have no doubts.

Table of Contents


For instance; planet move around the sun. In this case there was no proving until evidence (facts) was collected to prove this. The form of evidence people use change from one discipline to another. When using evidence one should convince the people of validity of argument with effective evidence. One should or should not ignore the evidence that argue against somebody claims. This is because an argument usually presents a specific interpretation or claim. One may have been told to create the argument stronger or logical.


One may be worried if he or she is logical or what the word strong means. To make a good argument is ongoing procedure. Logical is anything an individual can be able to do in practice. The argument is usually composed by evidence one has. People should make their argument strong by using an excellent premise.


An anecdotal proof is a form of evidence that is accurately unreliable. It is also as amusing and interesting incident known to support some points. For example, when one is supporting general claims. The information is referred to as hearsay for it does not provide evidence. This type of proof is actually poor form of evidence; in fact it is valueless for it is not verifiable. Fact is referred to the verified in sequence about present or past events and circumstance which is represented as objective truth. Therefore in general it means provable conception, while inference is a procedure used to derive logical conclusion from the premise.


Reference

Rotenberg A.T. (2008). Elements of argument – Bedford, St. Martin; 9th edition





Is this your assignment or some part of it?

We can do it for you! Click to Order!



Order Now


Translate »

You cannot copy content of this page