Self-Efficacy
Investigating the Effects of Self-Efficacy on Salary Expectations among Females and Males
According to Bandura (1994) self-efficacy is the conviction by people concerning their ability to yield chosen levels of performance that are influential over actions that have an effect on their lives. There are several effects associated with self-efficacy like the determination of the way people feel, behave, think, and provide motivation for them. These believes end up to varied effects in four main types of processes namely cognitive, motivational, selection, and affective processes.
An earlier research by Martin (1989) had hypothesized that the present trends in salary prospects was due to the lack of proper knowledge by women concerning effective salary information. In a research to investigate the truth behind this hypothesis, a sample of 51 male and 43 female among imminent university students were provided with information about current salary scales. It was found that, converse to the prospects; the subjects still had an ongoing difference in gender salary expectations despite the provision of current salary scales. That is, the females’ expectations were significantly different from the average in 3 of the 5 scrutinized sections of finance, personnel and accounting. The male counterparts, salary prospects differed from those of the females considerably in 4 of the five sections investigated.
Kaman and Hartel (1994) involved a group of business students in a study which required each of them to indicate their expected remunerations as well as the strategies of negotiation they anticipated as management trainees in particular job. The students were also expected to indicate their expectations in the recruiters and the conflicting positions in the negotiation process. It was found that there was a higher expectation in payment among the male as compared to the female counterparts, a greater possibility of involvement in active negotiations, less probability in the use of traditional promotion strategies of self and more opportunity for legal negotiations (Kaman and Hartel 1994). However, significant correlations existed amidst the expectations in pay and the negotiation strategies. In this regard, interventions strategies to arbitrate in the negotiation processes and expectations in pay in women were therefore put under focus and so is the need to have a deeper comprehension of accurate negotiations.
Stroh, Linda, Brett, Jeanne, Reilly and Anne (1992) carried out a comparison of female and male vocation succession for managers. In this study, male and female managers hired by 500 corporations who had all been relocated to other geographical locations for progression in profession 2 years prior to their participation in the study. It was found that women lagged behind subject to salary advancement in and the rate of job relocation irrespective of similar levels of family authority, similarity in workplace, and relocation of workplaces as well as equality in level of education attained.
A study by Glen (1973) required that a sample of 51 students assume being employed in a large company where the company’s president required them to discover a candidate among themselves who would be suitable vice president. It was found that 3 out of 10 of target’s competencies and 2 out of 10 attitude levels of close relationship between the sample and the target were infeasible in a 3 by 2 plan to examine their consequences on the provided job descriptions and proposed salaries. In this study therefore, the results indicated that salary and recommendation had a significant effect on competency. And this prompted the results of such in the industry.
In order to prove the effect of different contexts where all genders can accurately and freely display power and influence in requests, Wade (2001) introduced the concept of self sponsorship and other sponsorship. For the sake of her study, she researched on the social and psychological research which indicated that women had an upper hand in advocating on behalf of others as compared to the male. This was found to have no expenses incurred, although some associated association with gender, norms and roles restricted them from comfortably and accurately advocating for themselves. As a result, it has been found out that women less often advocate for themselves as they feel they may lose more than they gain and so this has contributed to the increased variations in pay and promotions.
Stevens et al (1993) evaluated the accuracy of various training programs in both genders’ acquisition of salary negation skills. To investigate on this issue, some MBA students received a two-stage training program that gave initial content instruction in negotiation skill, which was supplemented with training in setting goals or self-management after which participants were involved in salary negotiations with trained confederates using conventional guides in increasing salary awards. From the study, Stevens et al (1993) found out that at first women negotiated for lower salaries as compared to men and but after the control of the goals equality was achieved. As of the self-management participants the difference in salary improvement was reduced after supplemental training.
In another study by Penzer (1969) an attempt to an attempt to relate the implication of the level of education on pay was attempted showed that a negative association between the two existed with as the more one is educated the more they feel dissatisfied in their job and the pay. In this regard, Penzer (1969) found out that the college students have more negatives in the level of salary as compared to non-college educated employees. This has an effect of lowering the level of self-efficacy among college educated employees as compared to the non college employees.
In their quest to investigate the effects of self-efficacy and post training intervention for interpersonal skills acquisitions, Gist, Kay, Stevens, and Bavetta (2006) used two stage training on the participants where they were required to all acquire negotiation skills training, the measures of performance in negotiation were considered after the training. In the last stage of the training, participants were provided with alternative trainings in goal settings and management of oneself. The results on repeat of the same after six weeks indicated that a prior test of self efficacy contributed to original and delayed performance positively while interacting with the after training techniques to enhance the delay in performance. In this case, self efficacy resulted from self-management while training in goal setting resulted to the variations in the performance of the trainees for both high and low self efficacies.
Finally, in an experiment by Joesch and Murnighan (2003) involving three different experiments, an investigation was carried out to show the effects of interpersonal discernments on simulated financial and salary allocations. The first of the experiments investigated the association of choices with financial distributions interdependence, the second was done to examine the relationship between choice competence and effects and interdependence salary allocations and on discretionary payment allocations for a sample of working managers. In all the three experiments, egocentrism and judgments of incompetence or untrustworthiness had a strong effect on the choices by participants and so were allocations on the likes of others.
References
Baskett, G. (1973).Interview decisions as determined by competency and attitude similarity.Journal of Applied psychology, vol. 57, issue 3.
Kaman, V and Hartel, C. (1994). Gender differences in anticipated pay negotiation strategies and outcomes. Journal of business and Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue No. 2
Martin, A. (1989). Gender differences in salary expectations when current salary information is provided. Psychology of Woman Quarterly, vol.13.
Stroh, L. Brett, J. Reilly, A. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of male and female managers’ career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77. Issue No. 3.
Wade, M. (2000).Women and salary negotiation: The costs of self- advocacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 34
Stevens, C. Baretta, A. and Gist M. (1993). Gender differences in the acquisition of salary negotiations: The role of goals, self efficacy, and perceived control. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol 78 issue no. 5
Penzer, W.N. (1969). Education level and satisfaction with pay; an attempted
replication. Personal Psychology, vol 22 issue no. 185
Gist, M. Stevens, C., and Bavetta, A. (2006). Effects of self- efficacy and post training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills.Vol. 44, issue 4
Oesch, J. Murnighan, J. (2003). Effects of self- efficacy and post training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Social Justice Research, vol. 16 Issue no.1
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
