Quantitative Research Designs
Quantitative Research Designs
Quantitative Research Designs: End-of-life ethical Issues
Source 1
Badger, F. & Shaw, K. L. (2012). An evaluation of the impact of the gold standards framework on collaboration in end-of-life care in nursing homes, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(5): 586-595
This source comprises of a study that seeks to evaluate the collaborative framework for end-of-life treatment in nursing organizations. For the quantitative framework of this study, the researchers collected data from ten nursing organizations in the United Kingdom. For every participating organization, the researchers examined different variables including the implication of ethics on quality of care for the elderly. In terms of the results, the researchers identified different factors that undermine ethical standards while offering end-of-life treatment. Some of these factors include the scarcity of specialist practitioners and compassion fatigue.
Source 2
Todd, C. & Funk, L. (2010). Home-based family care giving at the end of life. Palliative Medicine, 24(6): 573-593
This article assimilates numerous quantitative studies on end-of-life treatment between 1998 and 2008. In essence, the authors focus on the quantitative research frameworks pertaining to this topic by different authors. For the research, the authors examine 129 studies by different practitioners and scholars. Firstly, this source examines the different challenges faced by researchers while developing quantitative surveys on end-of-life treatment. In such studies, the most outstanding shortcomings include small samples and ineffectual frameworks for data analysis. These challenges have far reaching implications upon the standards of ethics in end-of-life treatment. For instance, small sample sizes affect the quality of ethical frameworks implemented in health care organizations.
Critique of the Design
The appropriateness of the quantitative research design used in each survey could be examined in terms of the different benefits and shortcomings. In the first survey, Badger et al. (2012) uses a representative sample of 10 nursing homes in order to evaluate different aspects pertaining to end-of-life treatment. In quantitative research, a larger sample size facilitates for accuracy.
Additionally, a larger sample size is highly effective in terms of minimizing instances of bias (Tappen, 2010). This implies that a smaller sample size was an outstanding shortcoming in the quantitative framework used by Badger et al. (2012). In terms of benefits, this approach is cost-effective. It does not involve extensive costs as compared to other types of research approaches. On the part of Todd et al. (2010), the survey was effective in terms of minimizing bias. This is because the researchers used a substantial sample size of 129. From a different perspective, the survey does not depict the various methods used by the researchers. This can easily undermine the standards of effectiveness in quantitative research.
Ramifications of Choosing an Inappropriate Design
In quantitative research, the type of design has far reaching implications upon the quality of outcome. Firstly, such a design is characterized by poor standards of accuracy. In any type of research, accuracy is among the most essential aspects (Polit, 2012). Poor standards of accuracy undermine the effectiveness of the entire study. Apart from accuracy, an inappropriate design leads to the exclusion of pertinent variables.
In order to enhance the quality of results, researchers must always examine all the essential variables. The omission of a single variable can tremendously derail the effectiveness of quantitative research. The third implication of inappropriate research design pertains to the effectiveness of implementation (Munhall, 2011). It is fundamentally essential for researchers to conduct surveys that have sufficient frameworks for implementation. Over the years, numerous researchers have investigated different issues but they do not have adequate platforms for implementation. This is extremely useful in health care research. An inappropriate design can also affect the standards of ethics (Goodman, 2009). All these attributes should be addressed in order to streamline the outcome of research.
References
Badger, F. & Shaw, K. L. (2012). An evaluation of the impact of the gold standards framework on collaboration in end-of-life care in nursing homes, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(5): 586-595
Goodman, M. (2009). Nursing research: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Munhall, P. (2011). Nursing research. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Tappen, R. (2010). Advanced nursing research. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning
Todd, C. & Funk, L. (2010). Home-based family care giving at the end of life. Palliative Medicine, 24(6): 573-593
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
