Team Evaluation Tool
Team Evaluation Tool
Team’s Functional Structure
This is the first component of the team evaluation tool. Its main function pertains to the evaluation of whether the team’s functionality is effective or not. There are various attributes for examining the team’s functionality. Firstly, it is essential to examine whether the different team members are familiar with all the duties and responsibilities of the team. If some team members are unfamiliar with such tasks, then the team’s performance is on the decline. Sufficient mitigation measures are necessary in order to rectify this problem (Zarate, 2008).
In contrast, if all the members are conversant with the various duties and responsibilities of the team, then the team’s performance is on course. The second perspective of consideration while assessing the effectiveness of the team’s functionality pertains to the conflict resolution mechanisms. Every team should have an effective framework for conflict resolution. A small conflict can easily hamper the productivity of a team. If the team has a systematic framework for conflict resolution, then it has high levels of effectiveness. Similarly, if the team lacks a comprehensive mechanism for conflict resolution, it has minimal effectiveness. These perspectives indicate the evaluation tools for the team’s functional structure. As components of the evaluation tool, they help in establishing the overall performance of the team (Bozarth, 2008).
Strategic Design
In order to enhance its effectiveness, this evaluation tool incorporates different strategies. Firstly, it is essential to examine the team’s alignment to the organization’s goals and mission. Through this approach, it is easier to avoid any form of bias within the team’s operations. The evaluation tool has also established sufficient strategies for avoiding any form of influence on the team’s performance. Essentially, this implies that the evaluation tool must not interfere with the various functions of the team (Davis, 2008).
This is a critical aspect of the evaluation tool because it helps in maintaining the highest standards of impartiality. From another perspective, this evaluation tool will not exclude any member of the team. The assessment will involve all members in order to avert a discriminatory approach. The inclusion of all team members in the assessment framework also helps in obtaining as much information as possible. Such information is essential in developing plans for the enhancement of the team’s productivity. In order to avoid bias in assessment, the evaluation tool will also include professionals drawn from other organizations. This perspective will help in enhancing the overall impartiality of the team evaluation tool (Bozarth, 2008).
Communication Processes and Style
Communication is critical element of any type of evaluation tool. Without sufficient communications, it is difficult to attain all the goals and objectives of the team evaluation tool. For this team evaluation tool, communications will encompass a multidisciplinary approach that also incorporates digital platforms. For instance, emails and videoconferences will help in carrying out the online assessment programs. During team meetings, all team members will respond to the questions of the evaluation tool in written form.
Effective communication processes will help in streamlining the effectiveness of the team evaluation tool. Members will be familiar with all the aspects of evaluation as a result of the tool’s communication processes. The team evaluation tool will also encompass simple language. This will avoid any form of complexity. Interpretations will also come in handy if some members fail to understand the various components of the team evaluation tool. Before the actual assessment, team members will be briefed about the different components of the team evaluation tool in order to enhance the outcomes (Davis, 2008).
Leadership Performance
The team evaluation tool also takes into consideration the various aspects of leadership. Without sufficient strategies for leadership, it is difficult for an organization to achieve its goals. The same case also applies to teams in that they would be ineffective without sufficient strategies for leadership. In most cases, ineffective leadership in teams hampers the overall productivity of other team members. For the team evaluation tool, the team leader must be in charge of all functions. Through such an approach, it becomes easier to have some form of control in the team. From another perspective, the team evaluation tool should have sufficient mechanisms for examining the efficiency of leadership performance in the organization (Lencioni, 2012).
Conclusion
The paper highlights the critical components of a team evaluation tool. Essentially, this tool helps in determining whether the team is productive or not. Firstly, it is essential to examine whether the different team members are familiar with all the duties and responsibilities of the team. If some team members are unfamiliar with such tasks, then the team’s performance is on the decline. Sufficient mitigation measures are necessary in order to rectify this problem. Essentially, this implies that the evaluation tool must not interfere with the various functions of the team. This is a critical aspect of the evaluation tool because it helps in maintaining the highest standards of impartiality. Effective communication processes will help in streamlining the effectiveness of the team evaluation tool.
References
Bozarth, J. (2008). From analysis to evaluation, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
Davis, D. & Davis, W. R. (2008). Team performance inventory: A guide for assessing and building, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
Lencioni, P. M. (2012). The five dysfunctions of a team: Team assessment, Hoboken,NJ:John Wiley & Sons
Zarate, P. & Belaud, J. P. (2008). Collaborative decision making, IOS Press
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
