Drug Testing Policy in Companies
Drug Testing Policy in Companies
Both alternatives in this situation have beneficial as well as negative ramifications. If the company does not raise the issue of drug testing in the negotiations, it will effectively serve as a scapegoat for employees to abuse drugs. The exclusion of drug testing from the company’s policy might also result into unnecessary losses. This would occur when the company is forced to rehabilitate the drug addicts within its workforce. When employees abuse drugs at the workplace, it compromises their concentration and productivity.
These perspectives are undesirable with regard to the company’s performance. Despite these shortcomings, the exclusion of drug testing within the company’s policy will help in averting potential conflicts with the labor union. It will also serve as excellent framework for enhancing teamwork among employees (Sullivan, 2005). Without such teamwork, it becomes difficult to attain the different organizational goals in all departments. The second alternative for decision making pertains to the inclusion of drug testing within the company’s policy framework. Similarly, this alternative has desirable as well as undesirable implications upon the company.
Firstly, it will help in protecting the company from potential law suits in case of employee accidents. Through this policy, the company will manage to streamline efficiency by enhancing the concentration or productivity of employees. The policy will provide the company with sufficient grounds for terminating employee contracts in case they are involved in drug abuse (Wang, 2011). However, the introduction of the drug testing policy might put the company on a collision course with the labor union. This is because the employees’ union is against the inclusion of such a policy within the organizational framework. This might form the basis of boycotts or go-slows at the workplace.
Analysis of Ramifications
Based on the ramifications of the inclusion or exclusion of the drug testing policy, it is evident that the company will incur more costs if it disregards the drug testing policy. The decision to include the new policy in the upcoming negotiations conforms to the criterion of long term ramifications. In order to safeguard the company’s wellbeing in the future, the integration of the drug testing policy is critical. This will not only protect the company from potential legal ramifications but also enhance its productivity. Although the decision will undoubtedly elicit criticism from the labor union, it represents the best interest for both parties. Other departmental supervisors might also object to the inclusion of this policy.
This is because they are yet to detect incidences of drug abuse in their respective departments. However, the policy affects the entire organization and not specific departments. This stance is necessary towards the averting potential conflicts from departmental heads. Although other criterions are vital in making the decision, evaluation of potential ramifications is vital. It helps in weighing the projected benefits against potential shortcomings.
Prior to making any decision, it is always essential to evaluate the potential implications of all decisions (Wang, 2011). This helps in making the most suitable decision. If the company excludes the drug testing policy from the negotiations, there is the likelihood of incurring costs in the future. On the other, the inclusion of the policy in the negotiations will help in strengthening the company’s position.
Recommendation: Drug Testing should be an issue of inclusion in the upcoming negotiations.
Criterion: The long term ramifications if the company sets a new policy to address the situation
References
Is this your assignment or some part of it?
We can do it for you! Click to Order!
